Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)

Cancer Information Summaries « English « Health professionals « A

Advanced Unfavorable Hodgkin Lymphoma

Note: Some citations in the text of this section are followed by a level of evidence. The PDQ editorial boards use a formal ranking system to help the reader judge the strength of evidence linked to the reported results of a therapeutic strategy. (Refer to the PDQ summary on Levels of Evidence for more information.)

Drug combinations described in this section:

  • ABVD: doxorubicin plus bleomycin plus vinblastine plus dacarbazine.
  • BEACOPP: bleomycin plus etoposide plus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide plus vincristine plus procarbazine plus prednisone.
  • COPP/ABVD: cyclophosphamide plus vincristine plus procarbazine plus prednisone/doxorubicin plus bleomycin plus vinblastine plus dacarbazine.
  • MOPP: mechlorethamine plus vincristine plus procarbazine plus prednisone.
  • MOPP alternating with ABVD: mechlorethamine plus vincristine plus procarbazine plus prednisone alternating with doxorubicin plus bleomycin plus vinblastine plus dacarbazine.
  • MOPP/ABV hybrid: mechlorethamine plus vincristine plus procarbazine plus prednisone/doxorubicin plus bleomycin plus vinblastine.
  • Stanford V: doxorubicin plus vinblastine plus mechlorethamine plus etoposide plus vincristine plus bleomycin plus prednisone.

Patients are designated as having advanced unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) if they have clinical stage III or stage IV disease and four or more risk factors on the International Prognostic Index for HL, which corresponds to a freedom-from-progression at worse than 50% at 5 years with combination chemotherapy[1]

ABVD therapy for 6 to 8 months is as effective as 12 months of MOPP alternating with ABVD, and both are superior to MOPP alone in terms of FFS (50% vs. 36% with a 14-year median follow-up; P=.03). [2] [3] [ Level of evidence: 1iiA] The Intergroup trial comparing ABVD with MOPP/ABV hybrid showed equivalent efficacy in FFS and overall survival (OS), but increased toxic effects in the hybrid arm, especially from second malignancies. [4] [ Level of evidence: 1iiA]

The German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group randomly assigned 1,201 patients with advanced-stage disease to COPP/ABVD, BEACOPP, or to increased-dose BEACOPP, with most patients receiving consolidative radiation therapy to sites of initial bulky disease (≥5 cm). [5] The 5-year OS was 83% for COPP/ABVD, 88% for BEACOPP, and 91% for increased-dose BEACOPP ( P=.16 for the comparison of COPP/ABVD with BEACOPP, P=.06 for the comparison of BEACOPP with increased-dose BEACOPP, and P=.002 for the comparison of COPP/ABVD with increased-dose BEACOPP). [5] [ Level of evidence: 1iiA] The actuarial rate of secondary acute leukemias 5 years after diagnosis of HL was 0.4% for COPP/ABVD, 0.6% for BEACOPP, and 2.5% for increased-dose BEACOPP ( P=.03). Stanford V is an alternative drug combination currently under clinical evaluation with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) in the ECOG-2496and the EORTC-20012trials, respectively. [6]

Three prospective randomized trials did not show a benefit in OS from the addition of consolidative radiation therapy to chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage disease. [7] [8] [9] [ Level of evidence: 1iiA] In a meta-analysis of 1,740 patients treated on 14 different trials, no improvement was observed in 10-years’ OS for patients with advanced-stage HL who received combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone. [10] [ Level of evidence: 3iiiA] No survival advantage is known for the use of radiation consolidation for patients with massive mediastinal disease and advanced stage, though differences exist in sites of first relapse. [11]

Clinical trials are addressing the role of more intensive regimens for patients with advanced-stage disease and poor prognostic factors. Controversy exists about whether the optimal strategy should involve early dose intensification, with subsequent risks of increased late toxic effects (such as leukemia) or whether ABVD should be employed and patients who relapse be salvaged with high-dose treatment and autografting. In a prospective randomized trial of 163 patients with unfavorable advanced-stage disease who attained a complete or partial remission after four cycles of ABVD, no difference was observed in OS or FFS either with high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant or with four more cycles of ABVD. [12] [ Level of evidence: 1iiA]

Treatment options:

  • ABVD for six to eight cycles.
  • BEACOPP (increased dose).

Current Clinical Trials

Check for U.S. clinical trials from NCI’s PDQ Cancer Clinical Trials Registry that are now accepting patients with stage III adult Hodgkin lymphoma and stage IV adult Hodgkin lymphoma. The list of clinical trials can be further narrowed by location, drug, intervention, and other criteria.

General information about clinical trials is also available from the NCI Web site.

References

Hasenclever D, Diehl V: A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin’s disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease. N Engl J Med 339 (21): 1506-14, 1998.

Canellos GP, Anderson JR, Propert KJ, et al.: Chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin’s disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP alternating with ABVD. N Engl J Med 327 (21): 1478-84, 1992.

Canellos GP, Niedzwiecki D: Long-term follow-up of Hodgkin’s disease trial. N Engl J Med 346 (18): 1417-8, 2002.

Duggan DB, Petroni GR, Johnson JL, et al.: Randomized comparison of ABVD and MOPP/ABV hybrid for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin’s disease: report of an intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol 21 (4): 607-14, 2003.

Diehl V, Franklin J, Pfreundschuh M, et al.: Standard and increased-dose BEACOPP chemotherapy compared with COPP-ABVD for advanced Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 348 (24): 2386-95, 2003.

Federico M, Levis A, Luminari S, et al.: ABVD vs. STANFORD V (SV) vs. MOPP-EBV-CAD (MEC) in advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Final results of the IIL HD9601 randomized trial.. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22 (Suppl 14): A-6507, 559s, 2004.

Fabian CJ, Mansfield CM, Dahlberg S, et al.: Low-dose involved field radiation after chemotherapy in advanced Hodgkin disease. A Southwest Oncology Group randomized study. Ann Intern Med 120 (11): 903-12, 1994.

Aleman BM, Raemaekers JM, Tirelli U, et al.: Involved-field radiotherapy for advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 348 (24): 2396-406, 2003.

Fermé C, Mounier N, Casasnovas O, et al.: Long-term results and competing risk analysis of the H89 trial in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte (GELA). Blood 107 (12): 4636-42, 2006.

Loeffler M, Brosteanu O, Hasenclever D, et al.: Meta-analysis of chemotherapy versus combined modality treatment trials in Hodgkin’s disease. International Database on Hodgkin’s Disease Overview Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16 (3): 818-29, 1998.

Brice P, Colin P, Berger F, et al.: Advanced Hodgkin disease with large mediastinal involvement can be treated with eight cycles of chemotherapy alone after a major response to six cycles of chemotherapy: a study of 82 patients from the Groupes d’Etudes des Lymphomes de l’Adulte H89 trial. Cancer 92 (3): 453-9, 2001.

Federico M, Bellei M, Brice P, et al.: High-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation versus conventional therapy for patients with advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma responding to front-line therapy. J Clin Oncol 21 (12): 2320-5, 2003.

This record was last updated on March 10th, 2009.


About the PDQ Cancer Information Summaries from the National Cancer Institute

PDQ (Physician Data Query) is a comprehensive cancer database published by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), which is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It contains peer-reviewed summaries on cancer treatment, screening, prevention, genetics, and supportive care, and complementary and alternative medicine; a registry of cancer clinical trials; and directories of physicians, professionals who provide genetics services, and organizations that provide cancer care.

The PDQ Cancer Information Summaries are peer reviewed and updated monthly by six editorial boards comprised of specialists in adult treatment, pediatric treatment, supportive care, screening and prevention, genetics, and complementary and alternative medicine. The Boards review current literature from more than 70 biomedical journals, evaluate its relevance, and synthesize it into clear summaries. Many of the summaries are also available in Spanish.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PDQ document.

Advertisement

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.